No two statistical concepts are more often confused than mediator and moderator variables. Both are “third” variables that affect the relationship between two other variables, although in different ways. It is easy to confuse the terms because they both start with M, have four syllables, and sound similar. I will note the difference as I answer what is the difference between mediator and moderator variables.
Mediator Variables?
A mediator variable is a link in a causal chain where one variable leads to another that leads to another. If we think of an X variable that is a cause of a Y variable, the mediator variable (M) is the intermediate step between X and Y. In other words, X leads to M and M leads to Y. For example, abusive behavior by supervisors (X) leads to feelings of anger in employees that experience it (M), and the negative feelings lead the person to quit the job (Y). We might say that employee anger mediates the relationship between abusive behavior and quitting. It can be an explanatory variable that accounts for why X leads to Y–abusive behavior leads to quitting, and anger is the intermediate mechanism.
Moderator Variables?
A moderator is a variable that affects the relationship between two other variables. That relationship might be different for high versus low levels of the moderator. For example, we might observe that grades on a classroom exam were related to amount of time students spent studying. We might further expect that there are differences among students in the extent to which studying is helpful. Some students benefit a lot, and others not so much. A variable that accounts for those differences would be a moderator. Students who have a high level of math ability, for example, might benefit more from studying in a math class than students have have a low level of ability. Studying might have a strong relationship with grades for high ability students, and little relationship for low ability students. We would say that ability moderates the relationship between amount of studying and grades.
What Is the Difference Between Mediator and Moderator Variables?
There are several distinctions between mediator and moderator variables.
- Mediator variables assume a causal process of one variable leading to the mediator and the mediator leading to the next variable in a sequence over time. Moderators do not have to concern causal processes but can affect relationships that are not causal.
- Mediator variables must correlated with the X and Y variables they are mediating. Moderator variables do not have to correlate with either of the other two variables.
- You can have multiple mediator variables that occur in a specific sequence. Although you can have multiple moderator variables, they are not sequential. For example, quality of studying as well as ability might moderate the relationship between amount of studying and grades.
- Moderators are useful in determining boundary conditions under which relationships might be found, and identifying such relationships can be helpful for practitioners as well as academic researchers. Mediators are purely theoretical entities that are used to test theoretical mechanisms primarily of interest to academic researchers.
Mediator and moderator variables can be seen often in studies across industrial-organizational psychology, management, and many other fields. Methods used to analyze them are important tools in the researcher’s toolkit. They are often confused by students and researchers alike, so it is important to keep in mind what they are and how they differ.
Image generated by DALL-E 4.0. ChatGPT 4.0 helped with the studying example.
SUBSCRIBE TO PAUL’S BLOG: Enter your e-mail and click SUBSCRIBE